Book fair

BOOK FAIR- 2012 WHEN E-BOOKS MEET THE MANGO PEOPLE†¦ It was a fine sunny morning when I with my bunch of my classmates went to the 18th annual Delhi book fair on 6th September 2012 at Pragati Maidan. It was  a nine-day affair featuring discussions on proliferation of e-books and interaction with authors, apart from availability of vast number of books on divergent genres. We were supposed to report for a radio show as per our curriculum and were told to reach Pragati Maidan at 10 in morning. Getting up early and witnessing the bumpy metro ride I reached Pragati Maidan at 10.30 am. All are group members waited for the respected teachers to give us the gadget. The time we waited for the teachers to come we discussed about the theme of our radio show. As soon as we got the recorder we tightened up our belts and went to hall no. 8 from where the book fair commenced. We chose children’s book as our theme for radio show and decided to take the bites of all the students and children. First of all we went to the information desk to know about the number of stalls that were based on children books and educational games. We found that out of 235 stalls 40 to 45 stalls were dedicated for the children of all ages. We also came to know that the theme of the book fair this time was e-books. We started with the school children of classes 3rd to 5th of New India Modern Public School and recorded their experience at the book fair. Also we talked to their teachers who told us about the books they preferred for their children. Then we all went to the group of school girls who came all the way from Himachal Pradesh along with their teachers to explore Book Fair 2012 as it was a part of their training program to learn English. They told us that it was their first visit to book fair and how it helps them in their training program. We also talked to the parents and children and different stall owners and recorded their aims and aspirations from the book fair this year. After we got the required bites we handed over the recorder to the other group and I went to look for different books especially the e-books. The new theme e-books influenced me a lot personally. The idea of saving trees by omitting paper for e-books was quiet paramount. I really liked the concept and especially the material that it offered. It was one of the easiest and environment friendly ways that makes reading and learning fun. I also went and saw many books by national geography and saw the epical photographs that were printed in them. Over all it was a nice educational expedition that was accompanied by fun and new learning ventures. VINAYAK VERMA SEM III-B

Land Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Land Law - Essay Example The position of the ?40,000 'compensation' paid by Brad. 5. Possibility of Celeb Bank removing Angelina from the premises. Rules â€Å"A mortgage is a security for a loan†1. This involves a transfer of a legal or equitable interest in the borrower's land to the mortgage with a provision that the mortgagee's interest shall end upon the repayment of the loan plus interests and costs2. This means that a mortgage is some kind of a loan that is given to enable a borrower to get interest in a land. The mortgagee (one taking the mortgage) gets interest to a given land or property whilst it is paid for by the mortgagor from the owner of the land3. In the case of Abbey National Building Society V Cann4 G lived with his mother D in a property. D contributed to the purchase price of a property that they moved into which G, the son, held for himself and his mother. They moved to a smaller house costing ?4,000 more than the previous house they both bought. The mother was only aware of the necessity to move but she was not aware of the fact that her son had taken another mortgage of ?25,000 with the defendants. Due to the son's failure to repay the mortgage, Abbey National Bank sought to repossess the house. D, the mother, was now living with her partner in the same house and she argued that she had an equitable proprietary right under the Land Registration Act 1925 (Now Land Registration Act, 2002). She therefore moved from the new premises and entered the old house that the bank was repossessing 35 minutes before the bank took over. The bank argued that D had no rights in the property. In deciding the case, the court examined whether the property could have been purchased without the mortgage or not. Also, the occupation of the premises under Section 70 (1) g of the Land Registration Act 1925 had to be permanent and not temporal in nature. It was therefore held that D had no rights to the property. In Ingram V CIR5 the question of determining the equitable right was based on whether the contribution made by a person claiming equitable rights to the property was vital in the acquisition of the mortgage or not. If it was, then the person has proprietary rights. If not, then there was no such right. Also, in National Province Bank Ltd V Ainsworth6 a distinction was made between proprietary interest and personal interest. In this case, the House of Lords held that before a right or interest can be admitted to the category of property right, it must be definable, identifiable by a third party and have some degree of permanence or stability. If there are some rights that do not fall in this category, it is classified as personal interest and is not a proprietary right and cannot lead to any claim under property law or trust law. Also, in the case of Lloyd Bank and Rosset7 it was held that the failure to contributing to the cost of running a house is not sufficient to create a proprietary right in a given property. Pettitt V Pettitt8 also demonstrate d that a man who contributed by making improvements to a house bought and owned by his wife was not substantial enough to create a proprietary interest. Where there was some contributions that was made by a cohabitee to the property, it becomes a resulting trust9. On the other hand, if the

EC Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

EC Law - Essay Example It is evident that the European Union needs to put some laws to prevent companies that produce mobile phones from producing phones with such negative impacts. Although the European Union set up a law on the amount of radiation a phone is expected to emit, the British government has not yet implemented it (Steiner, 2003, pp.51-60). The fact that the British government is reluctant in implementing the law, the French Verizon Phones Sarl company has raised a complaint that the phone companies in British need to adhere to the limit set by the EC laws on radiation. It is doing so because it has adhered to the regulations set. The British government is facing a little bit of set backs since the implementation by mobile phone companies in reducing the emission of radiation form phones will take longer than expected. The idea that implementation will be delayed was given by the UK Federation of Mobile Telephones Retailers (FMTR) as it is the joint body of all manufacturing and retailing phone industries. The federation and the government are working to ensure that the companies adhere to the rules of emission to protect the country form being sued by the French mobile company that has already written a complaint to the European Commission and the Member of the European Parliament (MEP) in the district where it is bas ed (Steiner, 2003, pp.51-60). The Buzz Phone Company is a British company that manufactures phones. The company does not adhere to the radiation limits set in mobile phones. It is faced with very many set backs in trying to adhere to the regulations. It is faced with high production costs due to high levels of unemployment in the area it is situated. For such reasons, it does not have enough money to implement on the regulations of radiations because it is expensive. The French company, Verizon Phones Sarl, has already written to the EU commission on the issue. It is not clear if